Yeah, or that Libyan UF6 could be from Pakistan. But the International Atomic Energy Agency, which conducted tests on the materials, has not reached the same finding and believes that the evidence is inconclusive. Several experts said the process of elimination cited by the Times still left open the possibility of other sources for the …
Rademaker at ACA
by | 2005-02-03 | 5 Comments
Both Paul and I were at the Arms Control Association annual meeting today, which included remarks by Assistant Secretary of State Stephen Rademaker. You’ll be hearing more about Rademaker’s talk …
More on North Korea and Libya
by | 2005-02-02 | 1 Comment
The NYT and WP stories are obviously describing two different intelligence methods, but the two don’t seem to exclude one another. Put together, they are perhaps compelling. Perhaps. Some relevant questions/comments: 1.When was the UF6 produced and shipped to Libya? Where did it come from? Who shipped it? I wrote in ACT: [According to the …
North Korea Sold UF6 to Libya
by | 2005-02-02 | 1 Comment
The Washington Post and New York Times are reporting that the Department of Energy has concluded that North Korea is the source of nearly two tons of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) surrendered by Libya. The New York Times starts strong: [E]xtensive testing conducted at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee over the last several months …
