Maybe. I hear at least a few ideas have been kicked around for a while.
Comment
Commenting is closed for this article.
about ACW
- All the stuff about WMD, intel and the national security bureaucracy by Dr Jeffrey Lewis and friends too wonky or obscene for publication. E-mail: ArmsControlWonk [at] gmail.com
new in the stacks
dusty in the stacks
in our archive
- Search
- or browse our full archive
Blog Posts
Get E-mail Updates
“Disablement” has always been around in the weapons biz.
It is the first step (which may be temporary or permanent) to make either a weapon or a facility incapable of acting.
The next step is dismantlement, followed by removal.
For example see:
From Belfer
Or
From the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management
— yale · Feb 21, 12:23 AM ·
I am not sure what is meant here, but what if we simply remove the ment and have disable, dismantle and remove? It might solve the argument, and remove the confusionment
— Ammonyte · Feb 22, 11:27 AM ·