Arms Control Wonk
Maybe. I hear at least a few ideas have been kicked around for a while.
“Disablement” has always been around in the weapons biz.
It is the first step (which may be temporary or permanent) to make either a weapon or a facility incapable of acting.
The next step is dismantlement, followed by removal.
For example see:
From Belfer
Or
From the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management
I am not sure what is meant here, but what if we simply remove the ment and have disable, dismantle and remove? It might solve the argument, and remove the confusionment
Disablement, A Tiny Clue
“Disablement” has always been around in the weapons biz.
It is the first step (which may be temporary or permanent) to make either a weapon or a facility incapable of acting.
The next step is dismantlement, followed by removal.
For example see:
From Belfer
Or
From the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management
I am not sure what is meant here, but what if we simply remove the ment and have disable, dismantle and remove? It might solve the argument, and remove the confusionment