This post is from September 2004. Facts and links may have changed since. See more from that month

Article1 min read

Debate thoughts

From an arms control perspective, the debate was mildly interesting.

Bush hit Kerry over his support for the International Criminal Court, something the PIPA’s voter studies show should be a losing issue for Bush if Kerry sticks him to it.

Kerry said he’d shut down the RNEP, Bush just mentioned missile defense in passing. I was surprised that Kerry spent so much time on RNEP, Bush so little on missile defense.

Oddly, the two candidates sparred quite a bit over whether or not bilateral talks with North Korea were incompatible with the Six Party Talks. It was weirdly wonky.

Bush also tried to explain that North Korea violated the Agreed Framework with a uranium enrichment, not plutonium reprocessing, program. I doubt any voter followed the explanation, which was trivially true but not an answer to Kerry’s charge that the Agreed Framework collapsed on Bush’s watch.

Jeffrey Lewis

Writing on ACW 2004–2026

Dr. Jeffrey Lewis is the founding publisher of Arms Control Wonk.com. He is the Director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey. His also a non-resident affiliate at Stanford's Center for Security and International Cooperation and a Contributing Editor to Survival.

All posts by Jeffrey Lewis