This post is from June 2009. Facts and links may have changed since. See more from that month

Article2 min read

W76 Problems Seem Overblown


Greetings from the Lufthansa Senators Lounge in Frankfurt.

I’ve been struggling with how to describe Ralph Vartabedian’s story in the Los Angeles Times about the W76 Life Extension Program. On one hand, Vartabedian (with some help from POGO) dug out some really embarrassing information the W76 Life Extension Program. On the other hand, Vartabedian uses the problem to make a larger point about the state of stockpile stewardship, which I think is misleading.

Despite claims to the contrary by NNSA in February, the first (and only) refurbished W76 is apparently still sitting in pieces at Pantex:

In February, the department’s National Nuclear Security Administration announced that the “first refurbished W76 nuclear warhead had been accepted into the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile by the Navy.”

But no delivery was ever made. The warhead is in pieces inside a production cell at the Energy Department’s Pantex plant in Amarillo, Texas, according to an engineer at the facility.

[snip]

B&W Pantex, the private company that operates the plant, was still awaiting delivery of a classified part from another facility and cannot assemble the warhead, the engineer said.

Navy spokesman Lt. Clay Doss told The Times on Thursday: “We have not received delivery of any refurbished W76 warheads. The answer is none.”

That is embarrassing for NNSA, which had fired off an awfully rah rah! press release celebrating “another great example of the unsurpassed expertise throughout NNSA’s national security enterprise.” (Really? Which is the other example?)

Now, that’s embarrassing. But Vartabedian engages in a little bait-and-switch. The “classified part,” according to NNSA spokesman Damien LaVera, is the arming, firing and fuzing (AF&F) system.

That is not an issue with the physics package, although Vartabedian devotes the bulk of his article (952 of the 1133 words by my count) to reprising old concerns about FOGBANK, which is part of the physics package. Vartabedian also describes FOGBANK as a “classified component” — which the casual reader is sure to conflate with the “classified part,” aka the AF&F system.

This is basically the same thing that General Kevin Chilton tried to pull with the vacuum tube hokum (It all knits together, Elaine) — using a problem with a non-nuclear component to cast aspersions on the success of the Stockpile Stewardship Program which is, for all practical purposes, about our ability to sustain the nuclear explosive package without yield testing.

Jeffrey Lewis

Writing on ACW 2004–2026

Dr. Jeffrey Lewis is the founding publisher of Arms Control Wonk.com. He is the Director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey. His also a non-resident affiliate at Stanford's Center for Security and International Cooperation and a Contributing Editor to Survival.

All posts by Jeffrey Lewis