Reuters and a number of other sources are reporting the arrest of Fortunat Lumu, Commissioner General for Atomic Energy in Democratic Republic of the Congo, over suspected plans to illegally sell uranium.
Basically, this is all the info: a Kinshasa newspaper alleged (no public evidence yet to support the claim, notes BBC) that uranium is missing from the city’s atomic institute, Congolese authorities confirmed the arrest of Lumu and another associate, and Congo’s Minister of Scientific Research Sylvanus Mushi said that there was contact with a criminal network, “a group of people coming from all over the world, from Europe, from South Africa, from the Seychelles.”
Stories on uranium from the Republic of the Congo have been popping up for a while, and like this most recent one, each time seem to lack any details. Global Security Newswire reported on it in June 2004 and July 2006. In November 2006 Reuters quoted unnamed officials on concerns of sales to Iran.
Last August, Jeffrey wrote a post tearing into a Sunday Times of London article which claimed uranium sales from Congo to Iran. Clearly, the AP was not paying attention to Jeffrey’s wisdom (which, by the way, comes up quickly in a google search for the story), and again referenced the Sunday Times report.
I think that Dr. Jeff trashed the Sunday Times story in error.
He appears to have misread the sources and conflated incidents, and confused the use of containers.
In his post Dr. Jeff wrote:
The Times story:
The UN Letter July 2006:
What we see is that Jeffery’s 100 kg is from UN 149 – a local Congo theft of maybe a lunch-box sized container.
The mass smuggling (in UN 150) was a Tanzanian intercept and was unquantified.If the source is to be believed it would be large shipment. The container held 50kg drums and a number of these drums are implied. Only 20 would be a ton, and there may have been many shipments.
The fact that the Coltan was been addressed to Kazakhstan is sensible. Labeled “Hidden Shipment of Uranium to be Diverted to Iran” may have been problematical as to unhindered delivery.
As to Iran’s need for the ore, it would allow unsafeguarded feedstock for clandestine enrichment.
If not to Iran, then we need to be pretty suspicious as to what the Kazahkstanis are up to with smuggled uranium.
I don’t know what the “truth” is about these issues, but it should not be simply blown off.
Its a cheap frame-up at best.
The stolen 100 uranium “bars” mentioned in the Le Phare newspaper story may be referring to TRIGA-II fuel elements.
These have previously been stolen from Congo, including fuel confiscated from the Mafia.
If it is TRIGA fuel, then the theft would contain 19 kilograms of 20% enriched U.
This would require only about 100 or so SWUs to create 4 kilograms of 90% HEU.
This is enough for a bomb made by real experts, or about a fourth of the required amount for a first-generation design.
Either way, it would be quite valuable to a country with any sort of enrichment capability.
I’ve recently met some pretty senior nuclear official people in the Congo. If I can find the time, I will check this out.
Jeffery may have been thinking of this earlier incident from 2002
Note that Lumu and his “accomplice” were released from custody after three days, per the BBC – http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6445303.stm
Update to the story
Read the whole article HERE